In preparation for the bigger register refactor, simplify one of the accesses otherwise it looked even more obfuscated after the refactor.
This can't be included in the main set because it causes a small change in the binary, although functionally this refactor is also a no-op.
Applies to coresight/next 30d1f1c71b
James Clark (1): coresight: no-op refactor to make INSTP0 check more idiomatic
drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
The spec says this:
P0 tracing support field. The permitted values are: 0b00 Tracing of load and store instructions as P0 elements is not supported. 0b11 Tracing of load and store instructions as P0 elements is supported, so TRCCONFIGR.INSTP0 is supported.
All other values are reserved.
The value we are looking for is 0b11 so simplify this. The double read and && was a bit obfuscated.
Suggested-by: Suzuki Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com Signed-off-by: James Clark james.clark@arm.com --- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c index bf18128cf5de..e2eebd865241 100644 --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x-core.c @@ -1091,7 +1091,7 @@ static void etm4_init_arch_data(void *info) etmidr0 = etm4x_relaxed_read32(csa, TRCIDR0);
/* INSTP0, bits[2:1] P0 tracing support field */ - if (BMVAL(etmidr0, 1, 1) && BMVAL(etmidr0, 2, 2)) + if (BMVAL(etmidr0, 1, 2) == 0b11) drvdata->instrp0 = true; else drvdata->instrp0 = false;
On 03/02/2022 11:53, James Clark wrote:
The spec says this:
P0 tracing support field. The permitted values are: 0b00 Tracing of load and store instructions as P0 elements is not supported. 0b11 Tracing of load and store instructions as P0 elements is supported, so TRCCONFIGR.INSTP0 is supported.
All other values are reserved.
The value we are looking for is 0b11 so simplify this. The double read and && was a bit obfuscated.
Suggested-by: Suzuki Poulose suzuki.poulose@arm.com Signed-off-by: James Clark james.clark@arm.com
Thanks, Queued.
Cheers Suzuki