linaro-toolchain June 2026

linaro-toolchain@lists.linaro.org

16 participants
17 discussions

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] 3 patches in gdb: 171 regressions on arm

by Guinevere Larsen

Hi! This seems to be an issue with your testing infrastructure. These patches have not touched anything that isn't related to record-full so there's no way they could be causing failures in gdb.arch tests. I guess this test is no longer reliable. -- Cheers, Guinevere Larsen It/she On 6/7/26 3:44 AM, ci_notify(a)linaro.org wrote: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. > > In gdb_check master-arm, after: > | 3 patches in gdb > | Patchwork URL: https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/136305 > | 1f3856ef4e9 [PATCH v4 3/8] gdb/record: remove record_full_insn_num > | 9165d18a941 [PATCH v4 2/8] gdb/record: factor out reading and writing the execution log to corefile > | 85ad6ec91da [PATCH v4 1/8] gdb/record: Refactor record history > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | 4562eab73d3 Automatic date update in version.in > > Produces 171 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running gdb:gdb.arch/skip-prologue.exp ... > | FAIL: gdb.arch/skip-prologue.exp: f2: $\bp_addr == $\prologue_end_addr (skipped too much) > | FAIL: gdb.arch/skip-prologue.exp: f4: $\bp_addr == $\prologue_end_addr (skipped too much) > | Running gdb:gdb.arch/thumb2-it.exp ... > | FAIL: gdb.arch/thumb2-it.exp: it_3, stepi 3 > | ... and 187 more > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gdb_check master-arm > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/builds/… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in > * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/builds/… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/builds/… > > Current build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-precommit/builds/… > Reference build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gdb_check--master-arm-build/builds/1021… > > Warning: we do not enable maintainer-mode nor automatically update > generated files, which may lead to failures if the patch modifies the > master files.

2 weeks

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-23-init-16289-g9c26d8c30c19: 1 regression on aarch64

by Yasuyuki Ohno (Fujitsu)

Hi, This test is incorrect. I apologize for the false detection. The criteria used in the test are inappropriate. Therefore, we will correct the test. It may take some time due to our internal release process, sorry. Best regards, Yasuyuki Ohno Software Development Div., Advanced Technology Development Unit, Fujitsu Research, Fujitsu Limited, JAPAN. ________________________________ 差出人: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> 送信: 2026 年 5 月 30 日 (土曜日) 13:36 宛先: contact-ci-compiler-test-suite(a)cs.jp.fujitsu.com <contact-ci-compiler-test-suite(a)cs.jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; a.bataev(a)outlook.com <a.bataev(a)outlook.com> 件名: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-23-init-16289-g9c26d8c30c19: 1 regression on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: | commit llvmorg-23-init-16289-g9c26d8c30c19 | Author: Alexey Bataev <a.bataev(a)outlook.com> | Date: Thu May 21 10:30:09 2026 -0400 | | [SLP] Unify IR flag and metadata propagation in vectorizeTree | | Replace scattered propagateIRFlags/propagateMetadata calls with a single | PropagateIRFlags lambda. Excludes copyable scalars from the flag | intersection set and drops nnan/ninf when a copyable lane cannot prove | ... 5 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 1 regression: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/Fortran/0118 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/Fortran/0118/Fujitsu-Fortran-0118_0266.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2228. (Require Linaro login) Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… Reference build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/9c26d8c30c1971881d710cf62d0f50b…

2 weeks, 1 day

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc-17-1238-g8e3eff39a456: 147 regressions on arm

by Richard Sandiford

Sorry for dropping the ball on this. I'm not really set up to do arm glibc testing, so I'd initially hoped that this was the same as PR125599. It turned out to be a different bug, PR125653, which should be fixed by r17-1422-g4ab2c727829c53. Thanks, Richard ci_notify(a)linaro.org writes: > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please > find some details below. > > In armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf native, after: > | commit gcc-17-1238-g8e3eff39a456 > | Author: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford(a)googlemail.com> > | Date: Tue Jun 2 20:50:27 2026 +0100 > | > | backprop: Move opt-out for abnormal edges > | > | r6-6843-ga864ad5ba2501d made sure that optimize_phi wouldn't > | optimise phi inputs for abnormal edges. See: > | > | ... 17 lines of the commit log omitted. > > Produces 147 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running glibc:stdio-common ... > | FAIL: stdio-common/tst-printf > | FAIL: stdio-common/tst-printf-format-as-c > | FAIL: stdio-common/tst-printf-format-as-char > | FAIL: stdio-common/tst-printf-format-as-int > | ... and 143 more > > Used configuration : > *CI config* tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf > *configure and test flags:* none, autodetected on > armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf--disable-multilib --with-float=hard > --with-mode=thumb --with-tune=cortex-a9 --with-arch=armv7-a > --with-fpu=neon-fp-armv8 > > We track this bug report under > https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1918. (Require Linaro login) > Please let us know if you have a fix. > > If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on > linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. > > -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- > > The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways > to reproduce a debug environment: > > You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in > * > http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-buil… > The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and > make commands are in > * > http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-buil… > The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in > * > http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-buil… > > Current build : > http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-buil… > Reference build : > http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_native_check_glibc--master-arm-buil… > > Instruction to reproduce the build : > https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/gcc/s… > > Full commit : See in git+ssh://linaroci@gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git

2 weeks, 1 day

Re: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-23-init-15894-g304d077d4324: 1 regression on aarch64

by Yasuyuki Ohno (Fujitsu)

Hi, This test is incorrect. I apologize for the false detection. The criteria used in the test are inappropriate. Therefore, we will correct the test. It may take some time due to our internal release process, sorry. Best regards, Yasuyuki Ohno Software Development Div., Advanced Technology Development Unit, Fujitsu Research, Fujitsu Limited, JAPAN. ________________________________ 差出人: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> 送信: 2026 年 5 月 20 日 (水曜日) 20:15 宛先: contact-ci-compiler-test-suite(a)cs.jp.fujitsu.com <contact-ci-compiler-test-suite(a)cs.jp.fujitsu.com> Cc: maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org <maxim.kuvyrkov(a)linaro.org>; jacob.crawley(a)arm.com <jacob.crawley(a)arm.com> 件名: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] llvmorg-23-init-15894-g304d077d4324: 1 regression on aarch64 Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In tcwg_flang_test/main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-lto-lld, after: | commit llvmorg-23-init-15894-g304d077d4324 | Author: Jacob Crawley <jacob.crawley(a)arm.com> | Date: Tue May 19 10:47:58 2026 +0100 | | [AArch64] Add missing FSub case to isLegalToVectorizeReduction (#198302) | | Adds missing RecurKind::Fsub case to lower to partial reduction. Produces 1 regression: | | regressions.sum: | Running test-suite:Fujitsu/C/0022 ... | FAIL: test-suite :: Fujitsu/C/0022/Fujitsu-C-0022_0039.test | # "FAIL" means : the execution of the compiled binary failed / output of the binary differs from the expected one Used configuration : * Toolchain : cmake -G Ninja ../llvm/llvm "-DLLVM_ENABLE_PROJECTS=clang;lld;flang;clang-tools-extra" "-DLLVM_ENABLE_RUNTIMES=openmp" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DLLVM_ENABLE_ASSERTIONS=True -DCMAKE_INSTALL_PREFIX=../llvm-install "-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=AArch64" -DCLANG_DEFAULT_LINKER=lld * Testsuite : export LD_LIBRARY_PATH=$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/lib/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu$\{LD_LIBRARY_PATH:+:$\LD_LIBRARY_PATH} cmake -GNinja -DCMAKE_C_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang" -DCMAKE_CXX_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/clang++" -DCMAKE_Fortran_COMPILER="$\WORKSPACE/llvm-install/bin2/flang-new" -DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS= -DCMAKE_C_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_CXX_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DCMAKE_Fortran_FLAGS_RELEASE="-O3 -ffast-math -march=armv8.4-a+sve -msve-vector-bits=256 -flto -fuse-ld=lld -DNDEBUG" -DTEST_SUITE_FORTRAN=ON -DTEST_SUITE_SUBDIRS=Fujitsu -DTEST_SUITE_FUJITSU_WITH_FAST_MATH=ON "$\WORKSPACE/test/test-suite" We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/LLVM-2221. Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… Fujitsu testsuite : https://github.com/fujitsu/compiler-test-suite/ Current build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… Reference build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_flang_test--main-aarch64-Ofast-sve_vls-… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/llvm/… Full commit : https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/304d077d43240d43408dc5595a00374…

2 weeks, 1 day

RE: [Linaro-TCWG-CI] gcc patch #136430: 3 regressions on arm

by Jiang, Haochen

> From: ci_notify(a)linaro.org <ci_notify(a)linaro.org> > Sent: Friday, June 5, 2026 12:23 AM > > Dear contributor, > > Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find > some details below. > > In armv8l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf native, after: > | gcc patch https://patchwork.sourceware.org/patch/136430 > | Author: Haochen Jiang <haochen.jiang(a)intel.com> > | Date: Thu Jun 4 14:43:54 2026 +0800 > | > | [PATCH] testsuite: Resolve unique test names under several section > | > | Hi all, > | > | Last year, contrib/compare_test introduces non-unique test name check. > | ... 50 lines of the commit log omitted. > | ... applied on top of baseline commit: > | bed251d3acf [V2][PR target/125387][RISC-V] Properly cost mulh for RISC- > V > > Produces 3 regressions: > | > | regressions.sum: > | Running libstdc++:libstdc++-prettyprinters/prettyprinters.exp ... > | FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc -flto print redirected > | FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple.cc -flto print redirected > | FAIL: libstdc++-prettyprinters/simple11.cc -flto print redirected I only splitted the test layout here from 2 libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc print redirected to libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc -flto print redirected libstdc++-prettyprinters/debug.cc print redirected. I believe the original test is FAIL already. Thx, Haochen

2 weeks, 5 days

[Linaro-TCWG-CI] v11.0.0-1575-gc9349965ce4: 6 regressions on arm

by ci_notify＠linaro.org

Dear contributor, Our automatic CI has detected problems related to your patch(es). Please find some details below. In arm-linux-gnueabihf cross, after: | commit v11.0.0-1575-gc9349965ce4 | Author: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson(a)linaro.org> | Date: Wed May 20 14:51:39 2026 +0200 | | tcg: Optimize INDEX_op_mul[us]2 for 0 and 1 | | Zero operands produce a zero high and low product. One operands produce | a copy of the other operand and a zero or sign extension in the high | half. | ... 8 lines of the commit log omitted. Produces 6 regressions: | | regressions.sum: | Running gcc:gcc.c-torture/execute/execute.exp ... | FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64006.c -O1 execution test | FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64006.c -O2 execution test | FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64006.c -O2 -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none execution test | FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/pr64006.c -O2 -flto -fuse-linker-plugin -fno-fat-lto-objects execution test | ... and 2 more Used configuration : *CI config* tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc arm-linux-gnueabihf cross *configure and test flags:* --target arm-linux-gnueabihf --disable-multilib --with-float=hard --with-fpu=vfpv3-d16 --with-mode=thumb --with-tune=cortex-a9 --with-arch=armv7-a We track this bug report under https://linaro.atlassian.net/browse/GNU-1919. (Require Linaro login) Please let us know if you have a fix. If you have any questions regarding this report, please ask on linaro-toolchain(a)lists.linaro.org mailing list. -----------------8<--------------------------8<--------------------------8<-------------------------- The information below contains the details of the failures, and the ways to reproduce a debug environment: You can find the failure logs in *.log.1.xz files in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/b… The full lists of regressions and improvements as well as configure and make commands are in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/b… The list of [ignored] baseline and flaky failures are in * http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/b… Current build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/b… Reference build : http://54.172.246.49:9090/jobs/tcwg_gnu_cross_check_gcc--master-arm-build/b… Instruction to reproduce the build : https://gitlab.com/LinaroLtd/tcwg/ci/interesting-commits/-/raw/master/qemu/… Full commit : https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/commit/c9349965ce4a1548a0b19dc3cf859a4…

2 weeks, 5 days

Recent failures on lldb-aarch64-windows llvm buildbot

by David Spickett

> lld-link: error: failed to write output 'bin\liblldb.dll': permission denied Looks like a stuck process, can someone reboot the machine? Thanks, David Spickett IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.

3 weeks, 1 day

2026

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

linaro-toolchain June 2026