On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 12:21:51PM +0000, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 05/01/16 11:45, Mark Brown wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 04:35:28PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jan 2016 23:55:12 +0000 Mark Brown broonie@kernel.org wrote:
On Mon, Jan 04, 2016 at 03:09:46PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Thanks. That patch has rather a blooper if CONFIG_HAVE_MEMBLOCK_NODE_MAP=n. Is that the case in your testing?
Seems to be what's making a difference from a quick run through, yes.
OK, thanks.
Seems like I was mistaken here somehow or there's some other problem - I've kicked off another bisect for today's -next:
https://ci.linaro.org/view/people/job/tbaker-boot-bisect-bot/137/console
and will follow up with any results.
With both patches applied(one already in today's -next), I am able to boot on ARM64 platform but I get huge load(for each pfn) of below warning:
Bisect on today's -next with Arndale (an ARM platform) flags the same patch:
https://ci.linaro.org/view/people/job/tbaker-boot-bisect-bot/137/console
as does Juno which is an arm64 platform:
https://ci.linaro.org/view/people/job/tbaker-boot-bisect-bot/138/console
(it does get to a console but with lots of the backtraces Sudeep indicated).