On 10/03/2020 22:19, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
On 3/10/20 9:45 PM, Francois Ozog wrote:
Le mar. 10 mars 2020 à 21:15, Heinrich Schuchardt xypron.glpk@gmx.de a
0.2 - normative text The normative section shall be stated clearly: is " 1.2. Guiding Principles" normative?
IETF and ETSI have different language conventions to express absolutely mandated and various levels of optionality. This spec may be red by Telecom people or Linux people. Their interpretation may be erroneous on words such as "shall" (ETSI "SHALL" = "IETF "MUST"). The language need to be explicit.
A reference to RFC 2119 should be added to the EBBR.
https://github.com/ARM-software/ebbr/issues/46
g. IMPORTANT NOTICE: The contents of this email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information in any medium. Thank you.